2.
Material and Methods
To asses the influence of harvest time, seed density and
pollination, field and greenhouse experiments were
carried out.
Field experiments
Plots were sown on the 17th of april 1997 in Tenniken
(Switzerland) near Basel (604 m.o.s.; 7°50' E, 47°30'
N) on brown soil, fertilized with 120 kg/ha N.
Harvest time experiment
Four strains (Tab. 1) sown at a density of 30 kg/ha were
harvested several dates between the the 4th of august and
the 14th of october. The developmental stage of the
plants was determined at every harvest. In biological
terms the harvest was done between the beginning of
female flowering and the senescence of the plants. The
upper 50 cm of the plants inflorescences and leaves had
been used to distil essential oil as described below.
Plant material was either used fresh or had been kept
frozen at -20°C until distillation.
Seed density experiment
Three strains (Tab. 1) were sown in randomized plots with
four replications. The germination capacity of all
strains was 80%. Sowing rates of 2 and 5 kg/ha (row width
was 36 cm) and of 10, 30 and 60 kg/ha (row width was 18
cm) were tested. Weed controll was only necessary at 2
and 5 kg/ha. It was carried out by hand. Harvest took
place depending on the strain at seed maturity, that
means when about 75% of the seeds of the whole poulation
was matured. After drying the buds were separated from
the stalks by hand.
Table 1 Used strains and their provenance

Greenhouse experiment
The strain Kompolti was grown in pots in two identical
glasshouse chambres between the 4th of august and the
20th of november 1997. Plants were fertilized with
Wuxal®. Thrips, present at the very beginning of the
experiment, were controlled with Cymbush®.
About four weeks after sowing the light was reduced from
18 to 12 hours to initiate flowering. Male plants were
removed in both chambres to avoid uncontrolled
pollinating. Three weeks after the daylength change in
one chamber pollination was accomplished by daily shaking
mature male plants. Two month later, when seeds had been
totaly matured (75-100%), plants were harvested.
Distillation of the essential oil
Distillation took place in a copper pot with 1 l tab
water. The amount of plant material was 350-450g
freshweight, containig mainly inflorescences, some leaves
but never stalks. Plant material was separated by hand
and came from the upper 50 cm of the plant. Condensation
was done by simple water cooling. Essential oil was
collected using a separating funnel.
Analysis of the oils
Chemical analysis were performed with GC (on a Supelcowax
10 column) and GC/MS in the Central laboratory in CH-2052
Biel.
The quality of an essential oil can not be estimated in
metric terms. Essential oil is composed of hundreds of
substances from which only a small part are identified
yet. It is not known which compound or mixture of
compounds is responsible for a good or a bad scent. It
just can be evaluated whether it smells good or not,
respectively better or worse than another ones.
Scent tests were done by two essential oils specialists
(A. and L. Mächler, Essencia AG, CH-8400 Winterthur).
The oils of the harvest time experiment were compared
within strains to get a ordinal ranking list for each
strain depending on the harvest time. Greenhouse
experiment derived oils were compared in pairs of one oil
sample from pollinated and one sample of non pollinated
plants.
Titel
Abstract
1.Introduction
| 3.Results | 4.Discussion
|
5.Conclusions | 6.References | 7.Acknowledgements
Contact
|